Post by Char1ieOn Wed, 1 Dec 2010 10:29:02 -0800 (PST), "Raja, The Great"
Post by Raja, The GreatYou have a major comprehension issue when it comes to music. You just
do not get it. Most of these bands on the list made pop oriented
songs. They are not on the list because they were popular. Black
Sabbath were popular too, but they were not pop. There is a
distinguishing factor between pop and rock. But you being in serious
state of denial, will never acknowledge that.
The pop music charts are a measure of what is "popular". This means
it sells, is played on the radio, and people like it and want to hear
it. If Black Sabbath has a hit songs that sells and is heard on pop
music stations then they would be pop music. Pop music is nothing
more that music that is popular with the masses. I guess, using your
example, the only thing that keeps Sabbath from being considered pop
music is that they are not popular enough. Pop music is a measure of
the "most" popular.
Sorry, but you guys are completely wrong. Pop music is supposed to
have a poppy sound which is designed to attract audiences of all kind.
Zeppelin songs are played on radio all the time, they are still not
considered pop. The term pop might have been initially though as short
form of popular music but (from the 50s and on) that denotes
something difference.
According to wiki... (please do not resort to the lame trolling
attempt to disregard this)
"since the late 1950s, however, pop has had the special meaning of non-
classical mus[ic], usually in the form of songs, performed by such
artists as the Beatles, the Rolling Stones, ABBA, etc."
From about 1967 the term was increasingly "used in opposition to the
term rock music", a division that gave generic significance to both
terms. Whereas rock aspired to authenticity and an expansion of the
possibilities of popular music, pop was more commercial, ephemeral and
accessible.[1According to Simon Frith pop music is produced "as a
matter of enterprise not art", is "designed to appeal to everyone" and
"doesn't come from any particular place or mark off any particular
taste". It is "not driven by any significant ambition except profit
and commercial reward ... and, in musical terms, it is essentially
conservative". It is, "provided from on high (by record companies,
radio programmers and concert promoters) rather than being made from
below ... Pop is not a do-it-yourself music but is professionally
produced and packaged".
So pop is more commercial music. Black Sabbath/Led Zeppelin/Yes/Pink
Floyd/Velvet Underground etc were making artistically ambitious music
which more often than not was targeted to a particular segment of the
market... the segment which preferred aggressive/experimental/
intellectual music. The attitude was different. Many of these bands
hardly issued singles, did press interviews, appeared on TV shows. The
whole attitude was different. The fact that they STILL become
successful is MOOT. Everyone does want to be successful but that does
not mean everyone has the same attitude in making music.
The Beatles did do a fair bit of experimentation on albums like
Revolver/Sgt Pepper/White Album, but it was still POP for the most
part. Rolling Stones were the dirty side of rock n roll music. But
they were also a POP band... they were just not traditionally pop
sounding (at least not all the time). I think it is ridiculous to call
Led Zeppelin/Yes etc as a pop band (popular band makes sense) because
they were commercially successful. Their music was not pop sounding by
any means.